![]() ![]() Even if for some insane reason that could be considered a "feature" (really a directory symlink or junction should be used instead if you want the location pointed to to actually be synced), they should make it a setting that can be toggled. ![]() I'm not sure how something like that can slip by all the people that must have worked on the product. After that, they should just be treated like files. What they should do is only follow the shortcuts that are in the root copy folder. When I tried to sync what should have been about 50 MB of files, the progress indicator said it was uploading something like 21 GB. Running Out of Room in Dropbox Here are 11 Dropbox Alternatives That Offer WAY More Free Cloud Storage 1. It will actually backup all the folders that are pointed to by those shortcuts. So a good example is having a bunch of shortcuts on my taskbar to locations on my drive that I frequently need to access, and I want to back those up. It does a lot more than just file syncing (like calendars). If I have a windows shortcut in one of my folders that's being synced, it actually follows that shortcut and treats it like it's located where the shortcut is. It does the file synchronization and sharing, plus a web interface. SugarSync can be used with productivity and automation tools, including JotForm, Google Drive, and Asana, so its a good option to use at work. But then I discovered something so retarded I wanted to go outside and curb crush myself. I could be wrong about that, but I think that's the reason I didn't go with cubby.Ĭopy seemed perfect, in that it gave 20 GB free, the web interface seemed fairly good, and it actually let me leave my folders where they were and sync them by creating regular windows shortcuts from the "copy" folder. moving the folder you choose to sync into it's main folder and then creating symbolic links from the old location. I'm not a fan of this method because I don't trust that my other programs that depend on those folders won't stop working how they're supposed to work.Ĭubby seemed good until I discovered it's actually just automating that workaround. Certainly not the cheapest at 14 per month. You move the folders you want to sync into the "dropbox" folder, and then create a symbolic link from their original locations to their new locations. In general, SpiderOak is a service that you need to try out first if you want a reliable Dropbox alternative. They have a 50% off deal for the first year, so at least I'm only paying something like $3.12 a month for now, and getting 60 GB of storage so I can actually sync all my shit instead of just the important/frequently accessed stuff that I was doing with the free 5 GB.įor most of the more popular services that work around the terrible, yet for some reason super popular, concept of having a single folder that syncs with the cloud, I see a lot of articles suggesting the same workaround to get external folders to sync with the service. I wasted way too much time over the last 2-3 weeks trying to find a good alternative and in the end just settled paying for sugarsync.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |